However, until it only descreveuo picture of the primitive society more than agreement with the laws of the nature and queservem here of paradigm. But as to form a society more than agreement with this. How to establish what it is of Right of each in agreement Man in laws the dNatureza? In its verbete on ' ' DireitoNatural' ' it deals with this subject in ' ' Enciclopdia' '. As he was seen, the man is composed only of substance being that its functions sorealizadas for a similar mechanism to the other human beings. is talsemelhana that of course makes them sociable and dependent ones of the others. Poisningum would live happy far from the Human sort and nor would obtain to survive muitotempo total isolated. Also because of such posturanaturalista the Man is not a moral being. He does not have a law natural determined poruma soul or any instance transcendente, therefore its sodeterminantes passions and even though have rationality.
Not being possible to determine if aspaixes they are good or bad. But such comrespeito ontolgico optimism to the man does not enter in agreement with the European society. Not sendonaturalmente amoral, as to determine what it is just or unjust in the sociedadeHumana? Being the dependent men dosoutros will be badly and contrary to the others of the human sort, and itself exactly porconsequncia, to harm another Man, therefore, when making we are bringing it: the proper Human Sort that as much we depend. It is interesting that talprincpio if it applies in all the societies, of the complete the opposite desintegrariapor it if. Exactly the corrupted societies more, as the European, inside degrupos social fellow creatures as, for example, between outlaws who harm oresto of the Human Sort; between itself never they act as the Will of one only, docontrrio, if they would kill, or lose protection ones of the others.