Tag Archives: philosophy

Ambrosio Master

The received one happened with the appreciation of Smem Music of the Ambrosio Master, and at the same time the dynamics: to be in pair caught in the hands and to change finally when necessary and, both to be hugged. Emps, the Formadoras de Cincias of the Nature, had organized and systemize the popular jury, where we had as defenders the Agnaldo participants (agriculture peasant) and Simoni (agronegcio), the Young woman as the female judge. Then, at this moment, where the defenders had acted perceive how much they had assumen themselves of what we had studied until then, a time that had significant lectures as of the teacher Horasa, Oscar and Molica that had wisely given with many beddings the concepts until then, argued. As the presentation of the defender of agriculture peasant, who requires a new model of the practical agriculturist, to favor the agroecologia, it explanou well, the improvements of agriculture with the agroecologico model, however it did not use itself, in the researchers of the branch, as Altieri, Gleisman, Caporal and others. Ahead of this, the performance of the same left to desire in its arguments for the persuasion of the juries.

Already the performance of the defender of the agronegcio, the Simoni, acted validates in the researchers of the University and the Molica researcher whom the lecture gives wisely, and occasioned effect for the defender, therefore it made a historical rescue of the system of production, speaking of the genetic improvement, technological package that exists, does not require effort for the profit attainment very and that the chickens do not have hormones. It convinced the Simoni exactly, and it had an eloquent argument and that it led to the juries to approve the agronegcio. Both had had good arguments after, what it made it difficult the choice of the juries, this activity, the Formadoras of mathematics aturam, explaining the reason to have approved the agronegcio.

Human Society

However, until it only descreveuo picture of the primitive society more than agreement with the laws of the nature and queservem here of paradigm. But as to form a society more than agreement with this. How to establish what it is of Right of each in agreement Man in laws the dNatureza? In its verbete on ' ' DireitoNatural' ' it deals with this subject in ' ' Enciclopdia' '. As he was seen, the man is composed only of substance being that its functions sorealizadas for a similar mechanism to the other human beings. is talsemelhana that of course makes them sociable and dependent ones of the others. Poisningum would live happy far from the Human sort and nor would obtain to survive muitotempo total isolated. Also because of such posturanaturalista the Man is not a moral being. He does not have a law natural determined poruma soul or any instance transcendente, therefore its sodeterminantes passions and even though have rationality.

Not being possible to determine if aspaixes they are good or bad. But such comrespeito ontolgico optimism to the man does not enter in agreement with the European society. Not sendonaturalmente amoral, as to determine what it is just or unjust in the sociedadeHumana? Being the dependent men dosoutros will be badly and contrary to the others of the human sort, and itself exactly porconsequncia, to harm another Man, therefore, when making we are bringing it: the proper Human Sort that as much we depend. It is interesting that talprincpio if it applies in all the societies, of the complete the opposite desintegrariapor it if. Exactly the corrupted societies more, as the European, inside degrupos social fellow creatures as, for example, between outlaws who harm oresto of the Human Sort; between itself never they act as the Will of one only, docontrrio, if they would kill, or lose protection ones of the others.