While diverse theorists proclaim, loudly, that the company today encourages more participation, and address strategies humanists conceive work approximates modes, day after day we check that certain styles and tones used in communication, and certain climates generated in jobs walk in the opposite direction: treat people as machines, and at the end have that. Recent years have been marked by the great amount of work, reflections, conferences, courses, on leadership styles and management styles. He has written, and has said everything about business management, always in a line: defend a humanistic vision of workplaces. The large number of books that have been written, and continue writing on the subject, is the best reflection of this. Also the law 31/1995, of prevention of labour risks, aware of the importance of participation in the effective prevention of occupational hazards, in its article 12, collects: The participation of employers and workers, in the planning, programming, organization and management control related to the improvement of the working conditions and the protection of the safety and health of workers at work is basic principle of occupational risk prevention policy, to be developed by the competent public administrations at different territorial levels. Between adopting a mode humanist conceive work, and the relations of command, and failure to do so, only half will meet with each other. Ken ODonnell, consultant with over 40 years of experience in the organizational world, warned the absurdity of not generate workspaces in which promoting the contribution, and encouraged the participation of all (to each from his position and responsibility), and said: If we do not improve the things that we can move, never will manage to improve what you don’t play. If conceive participation as the set of acts and attitudes that they serve to influence in a way more or less directly in the decisions of the business organization, or to modify its structure, is to some extent, understandable that entrepreneurs and managers see a potential danger to the structure of the Organization itself in the participation of workers, and thus consider that not everyone has the same ability to participate.